Why there
are no women in the Universal House of Justice
Many people
who hear, for the first time, that it is forbidden to elect women to the
Universal House of Justice, become really puzzled and confused, given such a
strong emphasis of the Bahá'í Faith on the equality of the sexes.
Bahá’ís usually answer that it is the
matter of faith: ‘Abdu’l-Bahá said there is a wisdom in it, and we
believe that it is so, even though no one knows why this ordinance was made:
In a
Tablet to an early woman believer 'Abdu’l-Bahá stated: 'O maidservant of
God! Know thou that in the sight of God, the conduct of women is the same as that of men… From the spiritual point of
view… there is no difference between women and men…' He added, however: 'As to the House of Justice: according to the explicit text
of the Law of God, its membership is exclusively reserved to men. There is
divine wisdom in this which will presently be made manifest even as the mid-day
sun.'
The
beloved Guardian in reply to the same query from a believer pointed out in a
letter written on his behalf on July 15th 1947: 'People must just
accept the fact that women are not eligible to the International House of
Justice. As the Master says the wisdom of this will be known in the future, we
can only accept, believing it is right; but not able to give an explanation
calculated to silence an ardent feminist!'
We
must have faith in the Supreme Manifestation of God and His Exemplar, Whose prescience
is revealed in such provisions which will one day 'be made manifest even as the
mid-day sun.’ [1]
I believe
(although please don’t think that I pretend to be any authority on this
subject), that I discovered the real cause of this provision, the one which is
able to “silence an ardent feminist.” The reasoning is a bit complex, so please
don’t despair to find a logic here before you read to
the final paragraph. There are few seemingly unrelated issues, which combine,
in the end, to give quite an impressive answer.
‘Abdu’l-Bahá,
while being in London, had one quite interesting conversation on this subject:
A
spirited conversation due to the visit of an ardent suffragist will be long
remembered by those who had the privilege of being present. The room was full
of men and women, many Persians being seated in their familiar respectful
attitude on the floor.
After
contrasting the general position of the Eastern and the Western women, and then
describing how in many respects the Eastern woman has the advantage of her
Western sister, 'Abdu’l-Bahá turned and said to the visitor: "Give
me your reasons for believing that woman today should have the vote?"
Answer:
"I believe that humanity is a divine humanity and that it must rise higher
and higher; but it cannot soar with only one wing." 'Abdu’l-Bahá
expressed his pleasure at this answer, and smiling, replied: "But what
will you do if one wing is stronger than the other?" Answer: "Then we
must strengthen the weaker wing, otherwise the flight
will always be hampered."
'Abdu’l-Bahá
smiled and asked: "What will you say if I prove to you that the woman is
the stronger wing?"
The
answer came in the same bright vein: "You will earn my eternal
gratitude!" at which all the company made merry.
'Abdu’l-Bahá
then continued more seriously: "The woman is indeed of the greater
importance to the race. She has the greater burden and the greater work. Look
at the vegetable and the animal worlds. The palm which carries the fruit is the
tree most prized by the date grower. The Arab knows that for a long journey the
mare has the longest wind. For her greater strength and fierceness, the lioness
is more feared by the hunter than the lion.
"The
mere size of the brain has been proved to be no measure of superiority. The
woman has greater moral courage than the man; she has also special gifts which
enable her to govern in moments of danger and crisis. If necessary she can
become a warrior." [2]
According
to ‘Abdu’l-Bahá, women are also more receptive to the Divine Teachings
than men:
Taken
in general, women today have a stronger sense of religion than men. The woman's
intuition is more correct; she is more receptive and her intelligence is
quicker. The day is coming when woman will claim her superiority to man.[3]
Please note
His statement that “The day is coming when woman will claim her superiority to
man,” it is important for our future reasoning.
Also, we
may recall that Bahá’u’lláh has called women “leaves,” and men
“branches” (or “twigs”).[1]
What could these terms mean?
Well, let’s
just recall what the functions of the leaves and branches are. Leaves absorb
the carbon dioxide from the air, and, using the solar energy, produce food for
the tree upon which they grow. The branches support the leaves, transport to
them the water from the roots, and take back the food which the leaves have
produced, so that the roots may store it and re-distribute. Thinking of this
analogy as applied to the men and women, it seems we may infer the following:
Women are braver, their intelligence is clearer, and they more
receptive to the Divine Light. Their intuition is stronger, which means that
they better understand what they should do in order for the society to prosper.
God has given them these powers, obviously, because they are the first
educators of the next generation, and have more vital responsibilities.
Men, on the
other hand, are charged with providing the money for the family, which very
much resembles the water-transporting function of the tree twigs. Also, they
have a responsibility to educate children when they get older:
Unto
every father hath been enjoined the instruction of his son and daughter in the
art of reading and writing and in all that hath been laid down in the Holy
Tablet. [4]
We all know
that it is men who love philosophical speculations. Women usually consider such
exercises a waste of time. However, many complex ideas both in the Writings and
in science require precisely this: an abstract thought, seemingly giving no
practical outcome, but in fact laying foundation for the future progress. It is
unimaginable to me how could a woman write a book on the hermeneutics of the
Báb, dedicating a few hundred pages to triangles and squares which are
reflected in the names ‘Álí and Muhammad,
etc.—it was a man, Nader Saiedi, who wrote The Gate of the Heart,
and dedicated years of his life to studying these unimaginably difficult
concepts. However irrelevant these concepts may seem to a practical mind, it
was the Báb who decided to speak about these things; therefore, it is
our responsibility to understand what He wants from us when expressing these
ideas.
Take an
example from science. Have you heard about a Schrödinger's cat? It is a
cat which is a mixture of a living creature and a dead body—until you open the
box and see it. This mental experiment really fascinates me, but there are not
very many women who take the same interest in the quantum mechanics (despite
the fact that it was a woman who introduced me to the Schrödinger's cat
itself :-).
So, you
see, maybe I overgeneralize here—I feel, myself, that this point needs more
thinking. I just try to understand why Bahá’u’lláh has given this
particular educational task to the men, to instruct “his son and daughter in
the art of reading and writing and in all that hath been laid down in the Holy
Tablet.” It is possible that one function of the twigs (i.e., the men) is to
read the complex metaphysical ideas in the Writings (to take, so to say, the
sustenance directly from the Pre-Existing Root), discuss them in a scholarly
environment, and then provide them, in a digested form, to the women, who then
apply them to the down-to-earth problems of the everyday life.
Another
important fact we find in the Utterances of ‘Abdu’l-Bahá is the role
which the women are destined to play in the establishment of the universal
peace:
The most momentous question of this day is international peace and arbitration, and universal peace is impossible without universal suffrage. … the mothers will not sanction war nor be satisfied with it. So it will come to pass that when women participate fully and equally in the affairs of the world, when they enter confidently and capably the great arena of laws and politics, war will cease; for woman will be the obstacle and hindrance to it. This is true and without doubt.[5]
I believe
it is rather a distortion of men’s nature, but we have to recognize that all the
wars were always started by men. Thus, men are aggressive and prone to
violence, while women are tender-hearted and caring. I would say that the
military exercises are just a sublimation of male instincts: see the military
uniforms, the parades, the mighty machines of destruction—you would be keenly
reminded of two roosters fighting, with their bright red crests and imposing
tales, or two male red deers with their huge horns, clashing with one another
(and a female deer looking from a distance :-). Yes, women love the conquerors,
but they hate losing their sons in battles for no obvious reason. They hear all
this male talk about patriotism and stuff, but if a woman would sit in the
President’s chair, she would hardly consent to spend $700,000,000 per day in a
hopeless battle on the other side of the globe, with thousands of human
casualties, and no clear outcome, except a ruin to that country’s economy and
people.
Also, let
us recall that it was always God's method to choose as His instruments the
weakest and most incapable individuals, and the most degraded nations:
…it
should always be borne in mind, nor can it be sufficiently emphasized, that the
primary reason why the Bab and Baha'u'llah chose to appear in Persia, and to
make it the first repository of their Revelation, was because, of all the
peoples and nations of the civilized world, that race and nation had, as so
often depicted by 'Abdu’l-Bahá, sunk to such ignominious depths, and
manifested so great a perversity, as to find no parallel among its
contemporaries. For no more convincing proof could be adduced demonstrating the
regenerating spirit animating the Revelations proclaimed by the Bab and
Baha'u'llah than their power to transform what can be truly regarded as one of
the most backward, the most cowardly, and perverse of peoples into a race of
heroes, fit to effect in turn a similar revolution in the life of mankind. To
have appeared among a race or nation which by its intrinsic worth and high attainments
seemed to warrant the inestimable privilege of being made the receptacle of
such a Revelation would in the eyes of an unbelieving world greatly reduce the
efficacy of that Message, and detract from the self-sufficiency of its
omnipotent power.[6]
We may confidently broaden,
I believe, the application of this same principle also to the relationship of
the sexes. That is, men are the weaker wing, and therefore God may well choose
them for the demonstration of His might and glory.
So, now we
may make a conclusion. It becomes quite obvious from the above remarks, that a
time will come, when women will enter all the decision-making bodies in the
world, and men will perhaps be blamed for all the past mistakes, like war, bad
management of economy, violence, and so on. It will perhaps be recognized that
men are not so keen intellectually, and tend to be absorbed rather with
irrelevant abstract speculations, sacrificing millions of lives for the sake of
their ideas of domination over other males, and winning women's attention. All the terrible ideologies of 20th
century, like Communism and Nazism, will be remembered and explained by the
males’ foolishness, and their violent nature.
In the
light of the above, it will not be surprising if we see, in hundred years, that
all the political bodies are entirely dominated by women. Men may come to be
feared for the past political mistakes, and if anybody would want to vote for a
man as a President, everyone else would shudder and say, “Do you want another
war?”
However,
the Manifestation of God for this age saw this possibility, and made a
provision to restore
the equilibrium. There will remain one institution in the world, which will be
composed entirely of men—and not just a small and insignificant one, but the
Universal House of Justice itself! The one and only
infallible political body in the whole world. I think the
Bahá’í Faith will be well-known to everybody by then, although we
cannot estimate its numerical strength in this distant future. However, at one
point, when everybody will already be a Bahá’í, the example of
Universal House of Justice as entirely male body will certainly become a
subject of heated disputes. How could it be, the people would ask themselves, that these rapacious, aggressive, violent males
can make such a wonderful institution to function? Was it not proved by the
thousands years of history that men are truly unable to manage the social
affairs?
So, we
can presume that at that distant moment, it will be the only-male membership of
the Universal House of Justice, which will allow the world to return to the
balance of men and women in politics.
Well, don’t
take me wrong—it's not that men are worse, 'Abdu’l-Bahá did not say
that. He said that women are better :-)
Now I think
that perhaps I was not clear enough in my essay. The idea was to suggest a
possible explanation for this puzzling question. Overall idea is not that any
sex is better or worse than the other, far from it. They are equal, but since
people are weak and tend to fall into extremes, it is not an easy task to
achieve that equality. I tried to show that it is quite possible for the
pendulum to swing in another direction—now women are considered inferior, but
after certain advances in consciousness it is men who may suffer just the same.
Indeed, it is very tempting to find a scapegoat, isn't it? Somebody has to be
blamed for all the wars and violence in the world. I would put it this way: men
are very peaceful by nature, indeed, quite fragile psychologically, and that is
confirmed partially by 'Abdu’l-Bahá in that talk in London. However, the
greater physical strength led them to believe that they are greater than women
in all fields, and previously they could easily assert their dominance by the
sheer force. Just beat your opponent with your fists, not your arguments, what
could be easier?
However,
men are "twigs" and "branches," they are intended by God to
play a rather supportive role. It is women who are the primary recipients of
Divine Bounties, which are likened unto the rays of the Sun—they are
"leaves." They digest the Divine Food, the air in this example.
However,
all these differences are intended by God, and should not lead to any
injustice. Men do have an important function to fulfill, as well as women have
the vital tasks of their own. None can function without the other. However, if
the men will be blamed for the lamentable condition of the present day world
(it is very likely that they will be, just remember 'Abdu’l-Bahá’s
passage that "when women will enter the governments, the wars will
cease"), then it may become a start for a prolonged period when they will
not be admitted into governments at all, out of fear that their presence there
will lead to more wars. Under these circumstances, the Universal House of
Justice will become a good example of the fact that it is not the masculine
nature which leads to violence, but everything depends on whether the governors
are submissive to God or not.
Thus, to
sum up, the final goal is that humanity must rise above any prejudices of sex
(race, color, class, etc.), and recognize that only nearness to God matters.
And surely, when the next Manifestation comes, She
will abolish this prohibition :-)
[1] From a letter of the
Universal House of Justice to an individual believer, May 26, 1971. Quoted in the Lights of Guidance, #2073.
[2] ‘Abdu’l-Bahá in
London, p. 101.
[3] Ibid, p. 104-105.
[4] Baha'u'llah,
The Kitab-i-Aqdas, p. 37.
[5] ‘Abdu’l-Bahá, The Promulgation of Universal Peace, p. 134.
[6] Shoghi Effendi, The Advent of Divine Justice, p.
17.